Wednesday, 18 May 2016
See the break-up letter this 7 year old wrote to her mom
This 7 year old just wrote the most heart-breaking break-up letter to her mom because she will soon have to move on. But guess what? She promises to always call. Lol! What a way to wish her mom a happy birthday
117 million LinkedIn emails and passwords just got posted online
Got a profile on LinkedIn? You just might need to reset your
password. LinkedIn announced this morning that another data set from a
hack suffered in 2012 which contains over 100 million LinkedIn members’ emails
and passwords, has now been released.In 2012, hackers stole some 6.5 million encrypted
passwords fro LinkedIn and posted them onto a Russian hacker forum.
If you had
a LinkedIn account since 2012 and you have not changed the password, you should
be worried. I f the password has been used on other sites as well you should
also be worried. But even if you don’t fall under any of these categories, it
is advisable that you change it anyway not just on LinkedIn but on any other
site where you use the same password.
LinkedIn in a statement on its website says it is taking immediate steps to invalidate the
passwords of the accounts impacted, and we will contact those members to reset
their passwords
Uber releases new feature to help you track your family members' rides real time
- Download or upgrade the latest version of the Uber app.
- Set up your Family Profile.
- When one of the members of your Family Profile take a ride, you’ll get to know details of their ride
- Live feed of the trip on your Uber app map.
- You are billed the cost of the ride and you will both receive a copy of the receipt
Uber now has a new feature on its app called Trip Tracker.
It was launched on Tuesday and it helps users track rides of family members in
real time and monitor how the ride is going via the map inside the Uber app.
Trip Tracker is part of Uber's Family Profiles which is a feature on Uber that
let's you invite people and create a family profile. Rides undertaken by anyone
within that profile is billed to the organiser.
It seems great for parents or older siblings who would want
to pay and track their children's movement. Also seems great as a security
feature. Once someone in your Family Profile requests a ride, you'll be
notified with the option to track the ride. You’ll know when they are on their
way, which route they are taking and when they’ve arrived. Oops! Children may
protest about their privacy but at least it helps parents monitor them while
they are on the go
Here’s a brief run down of how it works:
Saturday, 14 May 2016
Facebook's FreeBasics in Nigeria receives some knocks
Its not yet uhuru for Facebook's FreeBasics in Nigeria which was launched earlier this month. Paradigm
Initiative Nigeria(PIN), an NGO focused on youth and ICT development released a
lengthy statement via twitter yesterday, about why Nigerians should not get very excited
over the seemingly 'free' internet access just yet. As the saying goes,
'nothing is ever free even in Freetown'.
According to Facebook, Free basics
is an open platform that makes the internet accessible for free those who
cannot afford it. However, this free access is limited to partner websites and
applications. In Nigeria, it is provided by only Airtel for now and has some
apps and websites like Jobberman, OLX, BBC, the Guardian on it. It was
launched two years ago pre-dominantly in developing countries
PIN voiced out its concern as follows '...only subscribers on
an Internet Service Provider Facebook partners with, will enjoy these free
services to the exclusion of others – it is unfair to list some services
and exclude their competition... Facebook is clearly using this as a marketing
strategy so it’s not as much a social intervention as it is an opportunity to
get more people to use their service and become part of their product offering...Free Basics is a strategy that segregates the internet space for
commercial purpose and not as a social intervention initiative.' https://twitter.com/pinigeria
In other words, the motives of
Facebook is not entirely altruistic but for profit-making by stifling
competition by excluding other ISPs, Telcos, websites or apps. Interestingly, its been thrown out of India ont the basis of the “Prohibition of Discriminatory Tariffs for Data Services Regulations" and i doubt if countries like the US
that support net-neutrality (ie ensuring that all users have access to the
internet on equal terms) will support this. Maybe Nigerian legislators and
regulators need to pay closer attention to this 'Greek gift' than scramble for
juicy positions
Makes me wonder then, what the
essence of a free internet is when it is not totally free?
Apple invests $1bn in Uber's largest Chinese competitor
Friday the 13th is traditionally
seen as a day with a bad omen. Hopefully, that may not be the case for Uber, as
they received news that might just be any businesses' nightmare yesterday. Their biggest
rival in China, Didi Chuxing (formerly Didi Kuaidi) got a massive investment
from Apple of $1 billion Dollars. This funding and strategic partnership with
Apple could be a game changer for Didi Chuxing, the largest taxi-booking and
ride-sharing service app in China Uber as its biggest rival.
Pic: courtesy Reuters/Jason Lee
Uber's CEO, Travisk Kalanick, apparently seems to be taking this latest strategic move in 'ride-sharing wars'
with a sense of humor and joked about this in his tweet yesterday.
girlfriend owns @apple shares which makes her a didi investor... #Smh #ridesharewars #domesticissues #thanksALotTim (https://twitter.com/travisk/status/731018873168764929?s=09)"
Car manufacturers and people in
technology are increasingly forging new partnerships and this will be
increasingly beneficial for Apple which is looking to strengthen its hold in the
Chinese market after spotlight from regulators, as well as Didi Chuxing.
Thursday, 12 May 2016
Interesting ways to protect your website address from 'cyber-thieves'
A lot of businesses are now going online, trying to take advantage of the internet boom in Nigeria. One of the first things to do while you are trying to establish an online presence for yourself, your company or business is to register your domain name ie your website address. For instance, Coca-cola’s website is www.coca-colacompany.com. There may however be a problem where someone else has a similar website address which may lead to confusion with that trademark. Unlike in the process of registering a company where you can do a name search prior to registration and the company name will not be registered if confusingly similar to another, for a website address or domain name, there is no central registry to conduct such a search. Therefore another person with a company called cola crafts ltd may register the domain name www.colacrafts.com. Coca-cola may be able to successfully challenge the registration of the domain name colacraft and have the name deregistered, on the ground that it is confusingly similar to its trademark cocacola.
Therefore, if your company ever falls into this predicament or faces this challenge, it is important to note a few things so that you don’t run into the problem of having your domain name taken away from you by someone who claims to have a better claim to that name, thus losing all your customers and all the online reputation you may have built for yourself over the years. My first advice is to be proactive and to register your trademark (especially where quite popular and reputable), as many similar domain names as possible in order to protect from any possibility of cyber-squatting or hijacking. However, if you have been caught napping, there are still some remedies-
- Ensure that you have an existing legitimate trademark in that name. The UDRP policy which is the rules governing such situations stipulates that the website address should not be identical or confusingly similar to an existing legal trademark or service mark. Therefore to be able to successfully protect your website or trademark, you need to have a registered trademark interest in the name. Merely having a website with a confusingly similar name will not be enough to stop the infringing website address
- ensure that you have rights or legitimate interests in respect of the website address; and
- show that the person is using the domain name in bad faith.
Let me re-iterate that a legitimate website owner will not lose his name to you, even if confusingly similar, if you don’t have trademark over the name. He loses his website address if it is confusingly similar ONLY if someone else has a legitimate trademark in it. For instance, I will be unable to challenge a website with www.adorableadaorah.com as an address even if I have one calledwww.adoreadaorah.com if I don’t have a trademark in it. This is not the only criteria however. Making reference to the Coca-cola example above, if Coca-cola can show that the website address was not only confusingly similar to theirs but that the person who registered the site also had a bad faith intention in doing so, the domain name registrar can order that the domain name be transferred to Coca-cola. To protect your website, the three elements must exist.
Different circumstances can show bad faith. Some of them are that you registered the name primarily for the purpose of selling or renting the website address to the owner of the trademark or a competitor for a profit, to prevent the trademark owner from using it, to disrupt the business of a competitor or to use the trademark to confuse and divert users and customers to your site in order to make some money.
This policy has been put up to stop cyber-squatting and a practice popularly known as domain name hijacking, where people intentionally register website addresses in order to profit of it and resell it later. Eg Facebook recently won damages worth about $2.8 million in a cyber-squatting suit against various cyber squatters and typo squatters with similar names such as facebobk.com, facebooj.com, facebookwelcome.com. Also, the instance of the popular blogger Linda Ikeji, who almost lost the domain name of her popular blog to cyber-squatters also comes to mind.
However, popular trademark owners have been known to also arm twist or muscle smaller domain name owners who have rightful interest in those names but don’t have the resources to defend the legitimacy of their website addresses. This is known as reverse domain name hijacking. Sometimes they do so to stifle online competition or to prevent website set up to criticize them.
For the genuine registrant of a website address however, hope is not lost. You can still retain your name. All you need to do is to ensure that you have been using the website address for legitimate business before the dispute came up, your business or organisation has been commonly known by the website address even if you don’t have a trademark right in it or you have been using the website address non-commercially without intent to mislead consumers or tarnish the reputation of the tarnish the trademark. Therefore, if cola craft can show that even though the name is confusingly similar to coca-cola, the website address has been known long before the dispute, there was no bad faith intention in registering the name and it was not meant to divert consumers, the owners of the site may be permitted to retain the name. For instance Nissan motors were unable to get Nissan computers to relinquish its use of Nissan.com because the website was named after its owner Uzi Nissan and had been used for about 20 years prior to Nissan motors’s change of name from Datsun.
For inquiries and more clarification on contents of this write-up, feel free to contact me
Saturday, 2 April 2016
Apple at 40 - The founder who sold his shares for just $1500
We know of the two Steve’s but how well do we know about the
third founder of Apple and what can we learn from him about investing in tech start-ups in an ICT age?
Three young men sitting in a garage in California on April
1, 1976- Steve Jobs, Steve Wozniak, and Ronald Wayne co-founded Apple Computer,
now arguably one of the most known brands in the World today in ICT and
beyond. Wozniak was the charismatic and affable inventor, Jobs was the sales
person and Wayne was the voice of reason between the two men
Now 81, Wayne was just about the age Apple is now when he
met the younger Steve Jobs. Jobs who would regularly seek counsel from Wayne on
different issues needed Wayne’s advice one more time on that prolific day - to
convince Wozniak to become the exclusive brain in inventing for apple computers.
After convincing Wozniak, Wayne drew up the legal agreement for the company. Jobs
and Wozniak got 45% each, and Wayne had 10%, and the right to be the voice of
reason in any disputes.
Interestingly, Wayne pulled out a mere 12 days later. Jobs
had secured a contract to sell computers to a company that wasn’t so credit
worthy and Wayne not willing to take the fall in the event of any debt or liability,
decided to pull out. Wayne asserts he doesn’t regret this though because he
made the decision based on "... reasons that are still sound to me
today," he said. Interestingly, the
market value of his 10% would have been $600bn, 40 years later. Instead, he got
$1,500 in 1976 when he sold.
Wayne now lives in Nevada, one of the far flung points in the
US. Some call Wayne forgotten, but he says he never has regretted for a day, the
decision to walk away as that was not the future he saw for himself. Boldness
or lack of investment foresight ? We may never know but Wayne has this advice
for youngsters-
"Find something you enjoy doing so much that you'd be
willing to do it for nothing… and you'll never work a day in your life."
Wayne apparently found his even though it made him almost
$600bn dollars poorer but as I discussed earlier today with a friend, my advice to
young people will also be, never sell out your investment in a start-up just for a temporary
situation. Investment is always about risk and foresight.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




